Testoverview | Ranking | Alphabetic
Test Overview
An overview (in German) shows the results of the tests in one large table, the individual tests can be found by following the links on the names of the software systems (in German). The test methodology (in German) is described on a separate page along with the evaluation criteria. A summary of the test results can be found both in the E-Learning Unit „Fremde Federn Finden“ as well as here (in German).
Ranking
Excellent Systems
No system was ranked as excellent – but there have been many people who attended plagiarism detection seminars who scored 100% on the same tests!
Good Systems
Nr. 1 : Ephorus
Acceptable Systems
Nr. 2 : Docoloc
Nr. 3 : Urkund, Copyscape (premium), PlagAware
Nr. 6 : Copyscape (free)
Nr. 7 : TextGuard
Nr. 8 : turnitin, ArticleChecker
Nr. 10 : picapica
Unacceptable Systems
Nr. 11 : DocCop
Nr. 12 : iPlagiarismCheck, StrikePlagiarism
Nr. 14 : CatchItFirst
Collusion Detection
WCopyFind – insufficient test material for assessment
Code Vergleich
JPlag : „good“
AntiCutAndPaste : „unacceptable“
Not tested
BOSS
CopyCatchInvestigator
Eve2
iThenticate
MyDropBox
PlagiarismFinder
SafeAssign
WebMasterLabor ArticleChecker
Alphabetic List
AntiCutAndPaste
ArticleChecker
BOSS
CatchItFirst
CopyCatchInvestigator
Copyscape (free)
Copyscape (premium)
DocCop
Docoloc
Ephorus
Eve2
iPlagiarismCheck
iThenticate
JPlag
MyDropBox
picapica
PlagAware
PlagiarismFinder
SafeAssign
StrikePlagiarism
TextGuard
turnitin
Urkund
WCopyFind
WebMasterLabor ArticleChecker